While abortion is the cause of many a protest of pro life groups, any pregnancy terminated by any means, is one of the unanswered questions in this controversy. However, when a woman suffers a miscarriage, through no fault or intent on your part, almost everyone, on both sides of the thought, feel sorry for this woman. She lost a baby, a human life growing inside her. She can even die of complications of haemorrhage. Who can know what caused this miscarriage?
Women who are nutritionally deficient, or mentally traumatised, simply may not have the emotional or physical means to bring a pregnancy to fruition. Genetic factors may also play a role. A genetic predisposition to abortion can be guilty. Extreme stress can precipitate a miscarriage. This can occur at any point during pregnancy, most often during the first or second quarter. In the case of an unwanted pregnancy, such as can exist in the case of rape or incest, the psychological impact and could influence the woman's body, which could cause a miscarriage, with no conscious input on behalf of women. In the case of a genetic predisposition, the woman's body can simply should not to be able to provide a welcoming environment that requires a growing baby.
Here is where is an interesting question. If a woman cannot physically or emotionally, bring the baby at birth and life, she is to blame? Suppose a miscarriage is murder? Is a woman without guilt, or she should be cast in the role of a woman who chooses to interrupt a pregnancy through abortion? Some schools of psychology to promote the idea that people unconsciously may want a certain result for a situation, while consciously appearing opposite and have a desire satisfied his desire unconscious as a method to avoid feelings of guilt. Could this theory applies to a case of spontaneous abortion? How can this be conclusively be determined, one way or another?
Why, in the case of spontaneous abortion, women are not required to undergo psychological tests, hypnosis or the lie detector tests to satisfy that are pro position? While this may sound like a ridiculous proposition, this concept would be the argument of life pro to a logical conclusion and indiscriminate. The premise of this argument is that a woman who chooses consciously abortion can now be discriminated unfairly. If it is possible to undergo an abortion through a purely unconscious will cause a desired conclusion, because the defenders of life pro does not apply your premise of assassination of all pregnancies that are not going to end?
Aside from the specific issue of abortion, it is known that there is a phenomenon known as mind over matter. If it is possible for a person to perform superhuman feats when confronted with an emergency or crisis, as the elevation of a car to save a person trapped below, you must accept the possibility of a miscarriage that occurs through an unconscious will do it.
The point here is that when a woman decides to deliberately interrupt a pregnancy, for whatever personal reasons, it may simply be more emotionally prepared to take that decision than another woman without the emotional stability and the ability to make a rational decision. In both cases, the result is the same. That the child is born.
The final completion of the writer's point of view, is that this is a personal choice for every woman, which only she should live, for good or evil. So what is the difference between a miscarriage, a miscarriage and a conscious decision to abort a pregnancy?
No comments:
Post a Comment